A shift in sustainable development: Understanding biodiversity net gain, hydrology, ecology, and landscape
by Helena Preston
View post
Now that the dust has settled around S&P Global’s Corporate Sustainability Assessment (CSA), one of the most well-established and reputable benchmarks of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) performance, you might be one of the 13,000 companies reviewing their results from this year’s CSA.
The score is of course the one thing that captures everyone’s attention at first glance, but as you dig into it, there is so much more to it. Whether you are a seasoned CSA participant or new to the process, you want to be able to maximise benefits and ensure you learn from the process. From our experience, there are several key things you can start doing today to action your results effectively.
The CSA is an annual assessment of ESG performance based on financially material sustainability indicators, weighted to reflect what matters most in your industry. The results are used by hundreds of thousands of stakeholders every year – ranging from investors looking to inform investment decisions, to Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) and other non-financial stakeholders interested in company sustainability performance and by companies themselves to gain a better understanding of their own sustainability journey.
But, why does it matter?
The CSA has some clear, tangible benefits for companies responding to it:
If you’re asking these questions, you’re on the right track.
While the CSA is often described as an annual examination, it’s important to note that the process extends beyond a one-off evaluation. It is instead, an iterative process encouraging continuous improvement year after year. Your CSA scores act as valuable indicators for highlighting existing strengths and areas for improvement when compared to your industry peers. More importantly, they serve as an important starting point for initiating actions aligned with evolving reporting requirements.
Although many CSA reporters understand the value of their CSA scores, a common challenge is translating results into practical steps for improvement. To effectively action your CSA results, we recommend implementing a structured process for improvement that involves these 5 key steps:
The CSA evaluates a range of industry-specific criteria and questions. However, not all of these questions will be of equal priority for your organisation. Following a deep dive of your latest CSA results, it is imperative to identify the most material areas and significant gaps in your performance. This process should be guided by questions such as:
As illustrated below, this exercise provides a clear understanding of where your company stands in comparison to industry benchmarks and a snapshot of key gaps to close, enabling targeted efforts towards improvement.
To translate insights or gaps into actionable strategies, it is essential to create a roadmap that outlines short, medium, and long-term actions. When developing a roadmap, companies need to focus on defining clear and measurable ambitions against each topic and translating these into concrete actions and milestones. This ensures a clear step-by-step, year-on-year trajectory of improvement. To guide this process effectively, consider the following questions during the development of your roadmap:
A well-structured roadmap will serve as a guiding framework for sustainable progress.
Implementing and actioning learnings from the CSA necessitates collaboration across internal functions. Engage your teams early in the process and work through the results together. Address the following questions when mapping out teams to involve:
Effective internal collaboration ensures that sustainability initiatives are seamlessly integrated into the fabric of your organisation.
Responding to the CSA can feel like an extensive task, requiring companies to double up on efforts across different reporting requirements. However, the CSA is designed to take into account key standards and frameworks such as Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UN PRI), indicating overlap and opportunities for utilising information from already existing company disclosures.
Understanding the alignment of your CSA submission with other reporting requirements will help minimise duplication of efforts and ensure consistency across your disclosures. When aligning your CSA reporting with other requirements, you may want to consider questions including:
A cohesive reporting approach demonstrates a unified commitment to sustainability across various platforms.
Continuous improvement is a cornerstone of sustainability. It is important to stay informed about emerging trends and evolving priorities in your industry. Utilise benchmarking tools such as the CSA benchmarking database to assess top performers and glean insights from their strategies. Reflect on the following:
Remaining current with industry trends ensures that your company maintains a competitive edge in sustainability practices.
Amidst the major shifts in the global ESG reporting landscape, including the development of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) Standards, the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), and the upcoming Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards (ASRS Standards), the heightened scrutiny in this year’s CSA comes as no surprise. With such developments, it is now more crucial than ever to take the time to understand your CSA results and leverage your performance on ESG ratings for enhanced ESG disclosures.
At SLR, our global team possesses a wealth of expertise in ESG reporting and disclosure, offering comprehensive support throughout your CSA journey, including:
Get in touch with our global CSA experts for further information:
Charlie Hodkinson-Ashford
Director, ESG Strategic Advisory - North America
Germán Saenz
Director, ESG Strategic Advisory - South America
Peter Truesdale
Director, ESG Strategic Advisory – Europe
Miguel Oyarbide
Technical Discipline Manager, ESG Strategic Advisory – Asia Pacific
by Helena Preston
by Ida Bailey
by Peter Polanowski, Megan Leahy Wright, Armin Buijs